Our 9th American Atheist Convention

The conventions have been going on since 1970 and this was actually the 40th one. American Atheists normally have their conventions on Easter weekend. Why not? It’s not like Atheists haven anything else to do on that weekend and we can usually score good deals on conference room rentals. Although…is that really true? This year the convention was in Salt Lake City, Utah at the Hilton Salt Lake Center, fairly close to the temple at the center of town. However, there was a well attended Comic Convention at the Salt Palace Convention Center on the same weekend. I’m sure there were people from both conventions that wished that they could have attended the other one. In fact, I KNOW that there was at least one young lady in a local bar that would have rather been with the Atheists than the comic nerds (no offense intended). There will be another comic event at the Salt Palace in September but the Atheists won’t meet again until their next convention in Memphis, Tennessee on…you guessed it…Easter weekend. Perhaps the Atheists need to produce a comic book. There were over 100,000 comic book fans at the Salt Palace while attendance at the Atheist convention was a shade over 700.

In spite of the juxtaposition of events in the heart of Salt Lake City, the American Atheists convention was quite successful. Last year they met in Austin which is considered “Atheist friendly.” Salt Lake City was not as welcoming. For example, it was difficult to get local sign companies to take our billboards. However, there was a giant welcoming announcement posted in the SLC airport! One of the local sign media companies rejected the American Atheists billboard messages as “misleading, deceptive, and offensive.” What is “misleading, deceptive, and offensive” about a sign that says simply, “Utah’s families. All religious? Think again” with a picture of a rather typical looking family composed of a mother, father, and three kids? There is a thought that a billboard of cute kittens sponsored by the American Atheists would also have been rejected as “misleading, deceptive, and offensive.”

The Utah Atheists were welcoming, however. Dan Ellis and the Atheists of Utah were fine hosts. Just prior to the convention on April 6th, Dan and his group conducted a Mass LDS (Mormon) Church Resignation event. Over 24 attended and marched around the “Temple” before posting the letters of resignation. The Atheists of Utah Meetup.com group has over 850 members, fully 100 more than we have here in Tucson. So there are Atheists in Salt Lake City!

One of the main features of the annual convention is the “state of the organization” summary that is at the start of the main sessions. David Silverman has been doing a great job growing the organization and now we have a membership of over 7,000 which is up from about 2,000 when he took over. The organization is completely debt free and is purposely spending more than it is taking in. Of course, that can’t continue on forever because eventually the banked reserves will run out. The goal of American Atheists as outlined by Dave is to attack and normalize on the veracity, ubiquity, and privilege of the religious organizations in the United States. In other words, attack and verify the truth claims of the churches and in particular Christianity. We need to reduce the presence everywhere of religious influence. Finally, we must address the special privileges that are enjoyed by religious followers and organizations. All tax exempt organizations should be treated equally. Religious organizations should not be exempt from the IRS requirements that apply to other non-profits. Pastors should not get special breaks on their housing and the IRS should pursue violations in the churches with the same energy used to prosecute other violators. American Atheists are not asking for special privileges for non-believers, just equal ones. The American Atheists is not about making more Atheists but supporting, protecting, and building community for those who have come to Atheism on their own. The growth of the non-believers in this country, especially among the younger generations, is staggering and will pay big dividends in the future. Dave’s commitment to community and cooperation among the other secular and non-theist organizations is evident when looking at the attendance at the Godless March on Washington in 2002 and the Reason Rally in 2012. In just ten years attendance at a Washington D.C. event grew from 2500 in 2002 to over 30,000 in 2012. The Reason Rally showed the world that the various secular organizations could cooperate and come together to make a statement to the country that won’t soon be forgotten.

The speakers of the 2014 American Atheists convention came from a wide variety of backgrounds with diverse messages. This year there was a football punter (Chris Kluwe) and a winner from the Survivor television show (Denise Stapely). There were also speakers representing the LGBT and Black Atheists Communities. Speakers included popular podcasters and our very own Secular State Representative Juan Mendez. Several podcasts were performed live during the conference…and I had my first experience with gender neutral bathrooms at a national convention.

Aside from the formal presentations, there were plenty of diversions. There were VIP dinners, an award dinner, a comedy night, a new film screening, and a blasphemous costume event that ended with Karaoke. Salt Lake City isn’t the best city for pub crawls but a few of us broke away for some crowded bars and weak (3.2%) beer.

In short, I had a great time and I’m looking forward to the next one in Memphis.

 

 

 

Posted in American Atheists, Atheist Action | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

A Poem: The shame of religion

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here is another poem from the Reverend Andy.

The shame of religion

What do we stand for, what do we seek?
Power and wealth to bring the world to its feet
When did we turn, what evil did bite us
True humanity, is not what we stand for.

We were born pure, and full of promise
Now a road of no hope we do travel
Religion programmed us and did it well
It showed us how to walk, the road to hell

Tell us of the human spirit, we asked
They replied with eyes that glowed with evil delight
Don’t think, don’t worry, just follow our plan
Only our god can lead you to the Promised Land

Years, later nothing is better
We worship in a world full of, hate, power and greed
To spend our time killing each other, at our own speed
My god is the one the only excuse we need.

Open your, hearts, open your minds
Awaken the true human spirit, and teach us to be kind
Light the torch of humanity, so that we all can see
And banish the darkness of religion, for all of eternity

Rev Andy

Posted in Guest Post, Poem, Religion | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Skeptic’s Look at a Skeptic Blog

Skeptic Word Cloud

This blog is also about Skepticism. My friend, Kitty, publishes a blog the Yankee Skeptic. She publishes guest posts on occasion. In fact, she’s published a couple of my blogs on her site. She’s such a nice lady and kind to a fault. Most recently she posted a blog entry from one of her friends, Jon Claflin: Guest Post – Is the Modern Skeptical Movement Actually Necessary? If you click on the highlighted text, you should be directed to the Yankee Skeptic and the entry posted on April 13, 2014.

The short answer to the question is “yes, the modern Skeptical movement IS actually necessary” but the author makes an attempt, albeit a very poor attempt, at showing that it isn’t. His article makes clear that the movement IS necessary. Jon doesn’t understand the mechanics of Skepticism. His article is full of weak support, faulty logic, and logical fallacies. It starts with a faulty premise and builds to an unsupported conclusion. He states that talks and lectures on Skepticism are a waste of time and resources that could be better used in doing the actual work of Skepticism. According to Jon Claflin, “That’s how it was done in the past.”

According Jon’s bio, which he included at the end of his article, he’s a 51 year old self-taught Skeptic with a GED certificate and no college. He is an experienced comedy writer and currently working for an insurance company. He’s a Blues guitarist, Agnostic, a husband, father, and grandfather. Why would I mention his bio? Every day we are faced with new information and part of the process of critical thinking is to consider the source particularly when we are evaluating opinion and Jon’s article is an opinion piece. Each bit of information in the bio helps me decide how much value I should assign to the opinion. Nowhere in his bio or in his blog post is there any indication that Jon has attended any of the “modern Skeptic” activities that he denigrates.

His article begins:

“Think back for a moment and consider the social and scientific climate in the 1940’s America. I think that it’s fair to say that during and since that time, many erroneous (unscientific) ideas and unscrupulous claims have been successfully tackled and (last I checked) science almost always prevails. The interesting thing is that a vast majority of these erroneous ideas were defeated without the aid of a ‘Skeptical movement.’ I find this fascinating and curious.”

Jon is 51 years old. He obviously has no personal experience with the social and scientific climate of the 1940’s America. I agree that many erroneous and unscientific ideas were beat by science. It’s obvious, however, that many of the erroneous and unscientific ideas survived the 40’s and subsequent decades and are here with us today. Science doesn’t always win. Homeopathy is still around and has been around for over 200 years. The Marks family and other charlatans have been scamming people out of money for decades. People believe in UFO’s, ghosts, Bigfoot, therapeutic touch, and worldwide flood stories undeterred by science and the efforts of the “working scientists.”

It’s clear that Jon doesn’t consider the positive aspects of the “modern Skeptical movement.” He specifically doesn’t appreciate the value of, “…boat cruises, political activists, glamorous dinner events, expensive hotel seminars, meet & greet events, paid lectures, pub meetings, and book tours.” Each and every one of these activities is useful and beneficial to promote skepticism. Boat Cruises allow very close interaction between amateur and professional Skeptics and they help fund organizations such as JREF (James Randi Education Foundation.) The JREF in turn provides resources for Skeptics and educational scholarships. The dinner events serve much the same purpose. They are fund raisers and a chance for interchanges of ideas. Seminars create an environment of camaraderie and allow educators, researchers, and those interested in improving their own critical thinking skills access to others working in a wide variety of disciplines. Lectures and book tours are the engine of the movement. Both get the information out directly to the public and people writing books need people to buy them.

Jon didn’t use a single specific example. An example to illustrate my point, the JREF was instrumental in exposing the fraud that contributed to the death of hundreds of people in the Middle East. The ADE 650 was being sold as a bomb detecting device in Iraq. It was no more than a modified novelty toy that was supposed to find golf balls. It didn’t work as a golf ball finder and it didn’t indicate where explosives were planted but the promoter sold them by the hundreds, made millions, and led to the injury and death of hundreds of civilians and soldiers. The JREF brought together the scientists that tested the device in the California Desert to the politically connected Skeptical communicators and played a key role in ending that fraud and saved hundreds of people. Fraud charges were brought against the promoters and they have been sentenced to prison terms. Unfortunately, a patent for the fraudulent devices was issued recently in Romania. The pseudoscience “rubber ducks” keep returning to the surface and we need every tool at our disposal to get the word out.

I’m not buying Jon’s argument. The Skeptical movement may have some problems but it isn’t hurting society and making it easier for the purveyors of pseudoscience. Program’s like the Myth Busters and Bill Nye the Science Guy are also part of the movement and they work across the board from the young to the old to make science and Skepticism fun and exciting. Penn and Teller’s BS program ran for 7 seasons and covered a lot of Skeptical ground. A program that runs that long shows the effort is being appreciated and that we’re better for the experience of being exposed to it.

There is a lot more that I can say but this blog entry is already long. The bottom line is that Jon Claflin is entitled to his opinion but if he wants others to share his opinions, he has to make a more compelling case. He should continue on his effort to learn about Skepticism and truly educate himself on the basic mechanics of the process. If he can’t do it alone, there are groups such as JREF, the Skeptics Society, and local Skeptics Meetup.com groups that can help.

Posted in Skepticism | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Poem: God never loses at the craps table

This entry comes from a new friend. He is Reverend Andy and he wanted me to share it with you. Andy is new to Tucson and he’s enjoying the weather and glad to be here. He left New Mexico where he spent a great deal of time helping and caring for others. Last night, he attended his first Skeptics of Tucson meeting. The conversations and the company made him decide that he’ll be coming back for future meetings. Welcome aboard, Andy.

God never loses at the craps table

I am the almighty creator of heaven and earth.
I will rule your life; force you to obey my every word.
You will bend, bow, and kiss my holy feet.
Sub-servant and weak, to death you will be.

I created you, yet I will not interfere.
I will give you free will, to watch you stumble, fall with no care.
If you are good, I will hog all the credit.
If you are bad, I will blame you, say you are evil.

You will fight among each other, killing, raping, burning, and pillaging.
You will crave power, doing anything to get it.
Hopelessness will ravage the whole of the land.
Being God is so cool, whatever happens, I can’t lose.

I will bring wolves, who will sing you my illusionary song.
They will enslave your mind; promise you a heaven in the sky.
Like mindless sheep, you will follow them, even when you know it’s a lie.
Glory be and alleluia, if I have my way, true humanity will never have its day.

Rev Andy
Without love, human society is in a difficult state;
Without love, in the future, we will face tremendous problems.
Love is the center of human life.

 

Posted in God, Guest Post, Poem | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Arizona Atheist Sends Letter to Local High School

Sometimes being the Arizona State Director of American Atheists requires direct activism. On occasion, I receive complaints about violations of church and state that I have to address. Most recently the mother of a student that attends Sahuarita High School contacted me to let me know that there was an outside group handing out Bibles on the grounds of the high school. Her son was intercepted on his way to the bus loading area and handed a small book with a “cutesy” locker picture on the cover. Obviously, the book was specially published for handing out to students. She sent me pictures of the book and an annotated map of where the violation took place. She also included the names of the principal, the superintendent, and an assistant superintendent. She was afraid to bring up the situation because of possible repercussions and that’s why she contacted me. It’s too bad that the situation occurred in the first place, but it gives me the opportunity to take action. For one thing, it gives me a chance to dust off the letterhead stationery provided by the American Atheists. She gave me all the information I needed: the day, the time, pictures of the material, maps, and the names and mailing addresses of the folks I needed to contact. Perfect!

The first thing I did was look at other similar situations and the resulting court decisions. It is clear that handing out religious materials in school and on school grounds by outside groups is illegal. It is less clear when the distribution is done by students attending the school. There are gray areas, of course. Can the outside group stand on the sidewalks near the school? Are the sidewalks public or are they on school property? This whole situation reminds me of a couple of kids playing “I’m not touching you” games in the back of the family SUV. Whether or not it is legal in a particular case, there are several reasons that distribution of religious material by outside organizations on school grounds is a bad idea:

  • Students might not realize that the school itself is not endorsing a religious message. School officials must take affirmative steps to make certain that students understand this.
  • Students that reject the religious material in front of other students may confront peer pressure, coercion, and ostracism.
  • It is possible that a religious group, in its zeal, may harass students and force material and views upon the students.

     

In addition, parents have the right to decide what religious training their child receives. Teachers and administrators are limited in what and how they teach. Outside organizations cannot be held to the same government standards and parents have no control. Once a student climbs on the bus or disappears through the gates of the schoolyard, the parents should be safe in the belief that their children are free of religious proselytization until they step back off the bus or leave the school grounds.

 

Posted in Atheist Action | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Is there a Creator?

On occasion, there are a few minutes of spare processing time available in my brain and it wanders off to pick through scraps of well-worn thoughts. Bits and pieces are tossed in along with incomplete arguments not important enough to finish but too dear to toss out. Among the sad disregarded concerns, I hear Ray Comfort’s annoying New Zealand accent as he says, “Every human knows intuitively that the Creator is evident because of creation.” This scrap of thought is strangely annoying. It’s like a cactus spine I picked up on a trail. I forget it’s there but once in a while I’ll bump into it, feel the almost unperceivable sharp pain and know that soon it will be festering. I realize that eventually I’ll have to deal with it. There is something fundamentally wrong with the argument. I feel it more than know it. What is it?

“Every human being knows intuitively that the Creator is evident because of creation.”

This is the kind of pithy tripe that makes the president of the Living Waters Publications appear to be in control of every discussion. It is somehow simultaneously undeniably right but actually wrong. Firstly, not every human being intuitively knows anything. Science tells us that our intuition is often wrong. For example, intuitively we feel that the sun rises in the east but we know scientifically that the Earth is spinning about its axis and the Sun is relatively fixed in space. There are many examples of things that we intuitively “know” that are demonstrably wrong. Science keeps us on the right path to knowledge when our intuition fails us. Early humans might have survived without scientific knowledge but now we live in complicated societies that cannot. Science is like the instrument panel in an aircraft. It tells us what is really happening when flight conditions are less than perfect and we can’t rely on our senses and intuition. A pilot will become spatially disoriented and likely to die in a crash in less than three minutes without the aid of instruments when weather requires them. Intuition and “gut feelings” are no help and actually worsen the situation.

The second part of the statement is equally troubling. It is circular. Ray calls everything a “creation” then says it must have a creator. Let’s just back the truck up, shall we? With a small change in terminology this statement will appear as ridiculous as a New Zealander holding a banana in front of his mouth. Let’s replace the word “creation” with “something developed over time.” Realize that the word “creation” is often tied to God in its connotation. When discussing the existence of God or gods or the actions of God of gods it would be best to use more neutral language. However, there is no direct single word substitute. While that’s unfortunate, it’s not the end of the discussion. Creation is the wrong word for many reasons. It also implies instantaneous existence. Nothing we observe was created instantaneously. Everything we come in contact with was developed over time and nothing we see has a single creator. Take a car for example. Does the car have a single creator? I think not. Let’s just take a piece of the car. Take the tires. They were developed over time. They are now made of petroleum products and natural rubber but they started as rubber hoses wrapped around wooden wheels. Over time, improvements were made until we arrived at the steel belted, radial chord, and high performance device now mounted on our highly polished Aluminum alloy rims. There was no creator, not in the Biblical sense, but a series of people and events.

Cars, tires, and bananas were all the results of developments over time. They don’t have “creators” as much as developers. If you feel that I’m being too hard on Ray Comfort, just remember that he wrote the book, “You Can Lead an Atheist to Evidence but You Can’t Make Him Think.” Intuition is not evidence. Tricky word play is not evidence. I’ve yet to see ANY evidence presented that supports the existence of a creator god.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

An Atheist Looks at Noah

Members of the oppressed religious majority of this country are preparing to boycott the release of “Noah” the movie. Muslims hate it because it depicts a religious prophet. They get cranky about such things. Kathleen Parker, an opinion writer for the Washington Post, says that Noah would be an enjoyable movie to those that liked any two of the following: “Braveheart,” “Gladiator,” “Star Wars,” “The Lord of the Rings,” “Indiana Jones” or “Titanic.” The producers are already calling it a “blockbuster” but since the definition of the word means “commercial success” and the movie won’t be released until the end of March, we’ll have to wait and see. I’ll probably see it eventually and enjoy it. It appears to be a huge production and an action filled movie. The original story from Genesis 5:32 through Genesis 10:1 is roughly 2400 words so there has to be some artistic license.

However, I cannot read the story without noticing a whole lot of stupid. Is it really necessary to point out that the whole thing is ridiculous? Isn’t it obvious? Currently, the oldest living person is 116 years old. Check out the list of the verified oldest people. The longest lived person on the list died in 1997 at 122 years of age. According to the Bible, Noah didn’t start having kids until he was 500 years old. His sons were near 100 years old when the flood began. The Ark sailed on open water for almost a year before Noah makes a window and releases a dove. The bird came back with leaves from an olive tree. Does anyone want to make an educated guess as to how long an olive tree can survive underwater? In the end, God tells them to repopulate the world and don’t kill anyone ever again. I love the part where Noah after landing on Mount Ararat takes some of the “clean” animals that he’d just saved from a worldwide flood and burns them up in a sacrificial fire so that God could smell the burnt flesh. Perhaps Noah wanted to smell something other than the inside of his dung filled floating zoo. But it was a good thing that he did because the sacrifice made God promise to never hit the reset button on the Earth again. The story could have ended happily there. There were rainbows but no unicorns. The Irish Rovers explained that in their song and it would have been better for Canaan. Noah’s first order of business was to build a vineyard and make wine because he was “a man of the soil” which is Bible speak for someone who likes to get drunk and sleep naked which he did. He was passed out in his tent when Ham walked in and saw his dad in his altogether nakedness. Noah gets pissed because Ham saw him naked and so he cursed Canaan, Ham’s son, to a life of slavery. The End! Except for the part where the 100 year old sons of Noah: Shem, Ham, and Japheth get busy populating the world. By the way, Noah lives for another 350 years and dies at the age of 950.

I’m sure that’s not the movie Kathleen Parker saw.

Posted in Bible Story | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

An Atheist in the FreeThought booth at the Tucson Festival of Books

Last weekend was a busy one. There was the Tucson Festival of Books, a presentation by Hector Avalos, and a concert by Roy Zimmerman, all of which were sponsored by FreeThought Arizona. The book faire went well with plenty of books and free periodicals. We passed out close to 400 refrigerator clip/magnets with information of coming FreeThought Community activities. The presentation by Hector Avalos at the UMC DuVal auditorium was well attended. Roy Zimmerman’s concert at the Unitarian Universalist Church made our “Blue Dot” community forget for a while that we were floating in a sea of “Red.” On Monday, 32 Tucson Atheists met for their normal 3rd Monday meeting at Denny’s. With the exception of the book festival, all gatherings were as you might expect: friendly, supportive, and non-confrontational. To be fair, the book festival was also mostly non-confrontational. Most people not interested in FreeThought Arizona and its mission of support for Secular Humanism would simply pass by without comment. There were rare exceptions. These are the negative reactions I observed. Bear in mind that these were rare occurrences:

Before the opening ceremony on Saturday, an older gentleman stopped by long enough to determine that there were quite a few books on Atheism on display. He spit out some barely audible insults and quickly trotted away. He didn’t give anyone a chance to address his obvious concerns.

Later on a younger, bearded, tall man expressed quite loudly that there was “no way” that he could be an Atheist. I asked him why he felt so strongly. He replied, “Unless you can tell me where logic comes from, there is no way I can be an Atheist.” I asked him if it was logical to believe that way. Is it logical to say that Atheists have it wrong just because they don’t know? He looked at me and apparently decided that there was another place he needed to be and trotted away.

That’s the way it goes sometimes. At its heart, freethought involves thinking. Knee jerk, emotional responses to the mere existence of an alternate viewpoint will never win the day and there are those that would rather run away than address the apparent conflict.

One of the most contentious interchanges that happened at the book faire came from an older gentleman who thought he was being socially acceptable by referring to something that “a friend” told him. He said, “Someone told me that Atheists believe that they are responsible for their own creation and end up worshipping themselves.” To which I had to respond, “A preacher noticed I was wearing an ‘Atheist and proud of it’ shirt. He told me that all Atheists think they are their own creators.” It is NOT OK to talk about what Atheists believe or don’t believe. Speak for yourself. We’ll get along a lot better that way. He decided that it was time for him to “get along.” A few in the booth objected to my curt response and chastised me for not considering that he was “trying to be friendly.” But it’s a bit like someone covering up an obvious insult with the phrase, “I’m just saying” like that should make everything fine. In the final analysis, he delivered an insult but didn’t receive one in return.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

A Weekend of FreeThought Activity in Tucson

This weekend could be a busy one for the freethinkers of Tucson. FreeThought Arizona is sponsoring three individual events. On Saturday and Sunday, we’ll be at the Tucson Festival of Books. Our double booth (#335 & #336) will be in a similar location as last year, just in front of the Library on the south side of the U. of A. Mall. The circus area is right behind our booth. This year we’ll have volunteers standing by to answer your questions along with literature to hand out. Last year, our booth was very popular with a wide variety of visitors. We’re hoping to have a similar experience this year.

On Sunday, at the U. of A. University Medical Center in the DuVal Auditorium at 10:30 AM, Dr. Hector Avalos will present A Historical or Mythic Jesus? An Agnostic Viewpoint. Scholars of Jesus usually divide themselves into Jesus historicists and Jesus mythicists. Historicists believe that there was a real historical person behind the Jesus of the Gospels, even if there are many legendary additions to his biography.

From his Wikipedia article, “Dr. Avalos is an internationally recognized opponent of neo-creationism and the intelligent design movement, and is frequently linked to Guillermo Gonzalez, an astrophysicist and proponent of intelligent design who was denied tenure at Iowa State University in 2007. Avalos co-authored a statement against intelligent design in 2005, which was eventually signed by over 130 faculty members at Iowa State University. That faculty statement became a model for other statements at the University of Northern Iowa and at the University of Iowa.
Gonzalez and Avalos are both featured in the movie Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed (2008). Avalos is an atheist activist and advocate of secular humanist ethics.”

In addition to Dr. Avalos’s presentation, at 8:15 AM, Café FreeThought Get-together for a lively discussion of issues dealing with the intersection of religion, politics and culture. Bring Your Own Coffee. Dr. Gil Shapiro is the moderator. Announcements and Music follow before Dr. Avalos’s presentation. Lunch is available in the UMC cafeteria followed by a movie in the DuVal auditorium.

Tucson is part of Roy Zimmerman’s “Blue Dot Tour.”

On Sunday, at 6:00 PM in the UU Church of Tucson, Roy Zimmerman will be giving a concert. Roy Zimmerman sings satirical songs – original songs about class warfare, creationism, same-sex marriage, guns, marijuana, abstinence, Republicans (a lot of songs about Republicans), ignorance, war and greed.

People who grew up with Tom Lehrer will enjoy Roy’s performance.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Irritating a Critical Thinker

Ever heard a question like this?

Question: What has four legs, two horns, gives milk and barks?

Answer: Obviously, a cow. (I threw in the “barks part” just to make the question harder.)

Is that exchange irritating? I’ve seen these types of questions on tests where the instructions include “choose the most correct answer.” I’ve always found them irritating. They hurt my brain! Many Atheists have given up religion because they CARE about truth. I want my beliefs to be true not just mostly true. Perhaps there is a creature that has four legs, two horns, gives milk, and barks but it’s NOT a cow. As far as I know, a cow doesn’t bark. The correct answer is “I don’t know.” Or “I know of no such animal.” There is nothing wrong with “I don’t know.” Apparently, that’s not a universally held belief. However, lack of knowledge is NOT a sign of weakness. Not every question has a simple answer and our heroes are not always right. Sometimes, there is more than one right answer. Some of the most interesting experiences come from challenges to what we believe to be true. Fellow Atheists that have been raised religious should know this more than anyone but, believe it or not, they don’t. It’s tempting to slip into the “No true Scotsman” fallacy here, but people that leave religion then hook their wagon up to the next charismatic freethinker to come along are not critical thinkers.

Last year, on another blog, I published my opinion on Sam Harris’s position on the word Atheist. I believe that Sam Harris is very important to Atheism in general, as I stated in the article. However, I believe he’s wrong in telling us not to use the word Atheist as an identifying label. We need recognizable, unambiguous labels to identify and support others that agree with our world view. The Democratic Underground reprinted my blog entry and it generated 8 replies. Half seemed to accept or at least understand the point I was attempting to make while the other half replied with knee jerk reactions that did more to attack me than address the contents of the article. They were attacking me for attacking Sam Harris when, in fact, I never attacked him. I was simply disagreeing with his premise that we should avoid all labels and “go under the radar.” In the most irritating replies there were claims of knowledge about my character that couldn’t possibly be gleaned from a 500 word blog article on why we shouldn’t shy away from using the word Atheist. The illogic! It burns. Additionally, I wasn’t aware that my blog was reprinted in the Democratic Underground forums, so I couldn’t provide a timely response. Had it not been for a “vanity search” on Google, I wouldn’t have known about any of this. Never-the-less I don’t like people taking pot shots at my character, even if it did happen a year ago. People should concentrate on points actually contained in my writing, not assumptions about my character.

In developing this blog entry I found Characteristics of Critical and Uncritical Thinkers. Since I’m going to my Skeptics of Tucson Meeting tonight, it might make a nice handout. It might go well with our mission:

Mission Statement of the Skeptics of Tucson

We are a social support group of diverse individuals who share a common interest in promoting the understanding and application of critical thinking skills and scientific methodology in the explanation of human experience — from the ordinary to the unusual.

“We don’t advocate WHAT to think, just to THINK CRITICALLY”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments